Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Lee E. Knowles v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02284
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amtrol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Joyce Knowles and Lee E. Knowles
Swain et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02168
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amcord Inc and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Swain and Kathy Swain
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00903
Plaintiff: Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00903
Plaintiff: Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00724
Plaintiff: Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00724
Plaintiff: Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00724
Plaintiff: Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
Jack Keyian et al v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv10784
Defendant: 3M Company, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Jack Keyian and Penny Keyian

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?