Cases 41 - 50 of 91
CHISOLM v. INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv85759
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. CHISOLM
Defendant:
INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY, MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY COMPANY, COASTAL RUBBER & GASKET COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FISHER v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv85566
Plaintiff:
JOHN FISHER
Defendant:
BENDIX CORPORATION , OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. , PNEUMO-ABEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
CONWAY v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84777
Plaintiff:
SAMMY CONWAY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLOUNT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84754
Plaintiff:
JOEL BLOUNT
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWDER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84762
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. BROWDER
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURKE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84768
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BURKE
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84740
Plaintiff:
ANN ALLEN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BIRTON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84752
Plaintiff:
MARY BIRTON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOK v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84779
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COOK
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CARPENTER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84771
Plaintiff:
ELMER J. CARPENTER
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
