Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Briseno v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Natalie Briseno
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittard v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02652
Plaintiff:
Natalie Pittard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv05826
Plaintiff:
Natalie Charles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04667
Plaintiff:
Natalie Smith
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roman, Jr. et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01625
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NATALIE POWERS and JORGE ENRIQUE ROMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06196
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NATALIE BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engels et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06170
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Engels, Jr. and Natalie Engels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esparza v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06040
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Esparza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02873
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mannino v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04941
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Mannino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
