Cases 1 - 7 of 7
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Cross Creek Land, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01035
Defendant:
Creek Land South, LLC and Cross Creek Land, LLC
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
National Credit Union Administration Board v. People's Trust Federal Credit Union
as 3:2016cv00850
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant:
People's Trust Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lillis et al v. National Credit Union Administration Board
as 1:2015cv01339
Plaintiff:
Louis Lillis and Shirley Lillis
Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Smith
as 1:2014cv01491
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant:
Leonard L Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lillis et al v. National Credit Union Administration Board
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
Louis Lillis and Shirley Lillis
Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tindell et al v. Charleston View LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01712
Defendant:
Charleston View LLC, City of Coos Bay, National Credit Union Administration Center, Asset Management and Assistance Center and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Plaintiff:
Maxine Tindell, Scott Tindell and Steven Tindell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Tindell et al v. Charleston View LLC et al
as 6:2013cv01712
Defendant:
Charleston View LLC, City of Coos Bay, National Credit Union Administration Board and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Farmer, Maxine Tindell, Scott A. Tindell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
