Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Nava-Cruz v. National Freight, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER (10cv0823)
as 4:2010cv01879
Plaintiff:
Saul Nava-Cruz
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc. and Noe Lee Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hurtado et al v. Hausch
as 1:2010cv02541
Plaintiff:
John Hurtado and Thomas Edwards
Defendant:
Denver Hausch and National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rocha et al v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00823
Plaintiff:
Raul Rocha and Efrain Fernandez
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc. and Noe Lee Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Momayazi v. Tylman et al
as 3:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Momayazi
Defendant:
Michael Tylman, National Risk Management and National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ammons v. National Freight Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
Jack Ammons
Defendant:
National Freight Inc and Glenn Thomas Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
National Freight, Inc. v. Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
National Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ashby et al v. National Freight, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Harry D. Ashby and Lorraine Ashby
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc. and National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
National Freight, Inc. v. Freedom Imaging Systems, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01708
Defendant:
Freedom Imaging Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Freight, Inc. v. Solar Communications, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01648
Plaintiff:
National Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Solar Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Freight, Inc. v. Mail Tech, Ltd
as 1:2009cv01556
Plaintiff:
National Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Mail Tech, Ltd
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
