Cases 61 - 70 of 158
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv06611
Plaintiff:
Holly Schuetz
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK, a District of Columbia corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Peggy Rudnick v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv05568
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Peggy Rudnick
Goodwine v. New Jersey Transit et al
as 1:2017cv04528
Plaintiff:
Earl Goodwine
Defendant:
National RailRoad Passenger Corporation and New Jersey Transit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Inez Sunta Tarver v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv04381
Defendant:
Rudolph Haynes, Pamela Keyes, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Inez Sunta Tarver
Serenity Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak et al
as 2:2017cv04367
Defendant:
DOES and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Plaintiff:
Serenity Jones
Gomez v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as TXS/7:17-cv-00032
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez, Jr.
Hong et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as NYS/1:17-cv-00580
Plaintiff:
Junie Zhao Hong and Oksook Primus
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
KENNY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as DC/1:17-cv-00166
Plaintiff:
JOHN KENNY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
KEANE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as NJ/2:16-cv-09281
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEANE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and BOSTIAN BRANDON
Ong et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as MD/1:16-cv-03942
Plaintiff:
Tina Ong , Han Nam Ong , Enung Njoman and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
