Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brethren Mutual Insurance Company v. Fuel On Bloomsburg Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Brethren Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Fuel On Bloomsburg Inc. d/b/a Fuel on Truck Plaza, Mann Corp. and NEPA Trading & Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nepa v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv01330
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Deborah Nepa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nepa Transport BV v. Hans Schramm & Sohn GMBH & CO. KG et al
as 1:2009cv07394
Plaintiff:
Nepa Transport BV
Defendant:
Hans Schramm & Sohn GMBH & CO. KG and Nostag GMBH & CO.KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited v. Kyodo Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv05118
Plaintiff:
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited and Nepa Projects & Investments Limited
Defendant:
Kyodo Corporation, Kyodo Shipping Limited and Progress Shipping Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited v. Kyodo Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv05118
Plaintiff:
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited and Nepa Projects & Investments Limited
Defendant:
Kyodo Corporation, Kyodo Shipping Limited and Progress Shipping Limited
Garnishee:
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. New York Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nepa Shipping B.V. et al v. Jinghua Rizhao Steel Group International Trade Co. et al
as 1:2007cv06081
Plaintiff:
Nepa Shipping B.V. and Nepa Transport B.V.
Defendant:
Jinghua Rizhao Steel Group International Trade Co., Rizhao Steel Co., Ltd. and Fame Risen Development Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hudson Corporation, A.G. v. Med-Asia Shipping (HK) Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv05589
Plaintiff:
Hudson Corporation, A.G.
Defendant:
Med-Asia Shipping (HK) Ltd., Med-Asia Shipping Ltd. and Nepa Shipping Agency (HK) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
