Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Alotaibi v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-2523
Petitioner:
MAZEN ALOTAIBI
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, CHARLES DANIELS and LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
King-Hardiman v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-598
Petitioner:
ANDRE KING-HARDIMAN
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Reed v. Breitenbach
as 24-476
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEE REED
Respondent / Appellee:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH
Oseguera-Chavez v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Mark Oseguera-Chavez
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrus v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Reed Barrus
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartzell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Shawn Tosh Hartzell
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Ley et al
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Jamelle L. Russell
Defendant:
Ley, Klein, Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Halling et al
as 3:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Yoaudy Fernandez Morales and Yoandy Fernandez-Morales
Defendant:
Halling, Jessica Rambur, Nethanjah Breitenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boudreau v. Breitenbach et al
as 2:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Matthew Boudreau
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, K. Harris, John R. Alishio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, James Dzurenda, Dr. Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
