Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barnes v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00468
Petitioner:
Charles D.J. Barnes
Respondent:
New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallegos v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01172
Petitioner:
Alexander Gallegos
Respondent:
R. C. Smith and New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Head v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00509
Petitioner:
Herbert G. Head
Respondent:
New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortega v. Fourth Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Ortega
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District Court, New Mexico Department of Corrections and New Mexico Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haceesa v. Wrigley et al
as 2:2015cv00420
Petitioner:
Howard Haceesa
Respondent:
Jeff Wrigley and New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baca v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv00021
Petitioner:
Jason Baca
Respondent:
New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. New Mexico Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2013cv00838
Petitioner:
Joseph Flores
Respondent:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, Ellen Gonzales and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baldonado v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00573
Petitioner:
Jerry Baldonado
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gastelum v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2008cv00584
Plaintiff:
Esteban Baca Gastelum
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, New Mexico Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
