Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-119
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Shield No. 6577, NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond, Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141 and others
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe 1, Rachel Atcheson, Joe Baccellieri, in his official capacity as Chief of the New York State Unified Court System's Court Officers Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-121
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Shield No. 6577, NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond, Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141 and others
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe 1, Rachel Atcheson, Joe Baccellieri, in his official capacity as Chief of the New York State Unified Court System's Court Officers Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. City of New York
as 21-75
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Shield No. 6577, NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond, Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141 and others
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe 1, Rachel Atcheson, Joe Baccellieri, in his official capacity as Chief of the New York State Unified Court System's Court Officers Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Braga v. NYC Police Department
as 20-4061
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Police Officer Joe John, Joe Jane, Police Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Department, officially and individually in their capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronaldo Lee Braga
Sce v. City of New York
as 20-3954
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Inspector Sylvestor Ge, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department, Steven D'Ulisse, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department, Timothy Morgan, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sergeant of Police Andre Sce
Shepler v. City of New York
as 20-3844
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York, John Doe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Collura
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Stephen Shepler
Donmez v. NYC Department of Consumer Aff
as 20-3830
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Henderson, NYC Parks Department, Officer Ocelin, NYC Parks Department and Officer John Doe, NYC Parks Department
Defendant:
NYC Judge Charlotte Davidson, New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ibrahim Donmez
Starker v. Adamovych
as 20-3767
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Department, Louis Lodato, an individual and as representative of New York City Police Department, Does 1-20, inclusive and others
Defendant:
Christopher Kolenda, an individual and as representative of New York City Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oscar Starker
Maradiaga v. City of New York
as 20-3747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cosme Del Rosario-Bell, Jeronimo Maradiaga, Randolph Carr and others
Defendant / Appellee:
P.O. Jennifer Gomez, In their individual capacity, P.O. Jack Deng, (Shield No. 8379), in their individual capacity, John Does, New York City Police Department Police Officers (P.O.), 13, (the names John Doe being fictitious, as the true names and shield numbers are not presently known), in their individual capacities and others
Soos v. Cuomo
as 20-3737
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York in her official capacity, Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of the City of New York, in his official capacity, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morton Avigdor, Elchanan Perr, Steven Soos and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Young, Bradley M. Markowski, August N. Santore, Jr. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth McGuire, Law Offices of Kenneth McGuire
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
