Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Tia et al v. Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia et al
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia and Faleatafa E. Bentley
Defendant:
Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia, Edward Vergara, Joyce K. Matsumori-Hoshijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaonohi Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Tuitama et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Tuitama, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Matsuoka et al
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Bert Y. Matsuoka, Fituina F. Tua, Alfred Itumura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, Department of the Attorney General, The, HCF Mail Room and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. HCF Inmate Grievance Specialist et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Inmate Grievance Specialist, Nolan Espinda, HCF Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gouveia v. Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Petitioner:
Royce C. Gouveia
Respondent:
Nolan Espinda and Doug Chin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abraham v. Espinda
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Verece Abraham
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zachary Smith v. Nolan Espinda, et al.
as 1:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
Zachary Smith
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
