Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv02155
619) 924-5199 (fax:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
818) 222-3405 (fax:
Martha Noonan
R. Abcarian et al v. Meldon Edises Levine et al
as 2:2016cv07106
Defendant:
Meldon Edises Levine, Paul Krekorian, Bob Blumenfield and others
Plaintiff:
R. Abcarian, H. Reyes, J. Petrie and others
Interested Party:
Justin Kristopher Le-Roy, Brendan Eisan, Tyler Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stephen Yagman v. David H. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv06660
Defendant:
Jill Banks Barad, Joseph A. Brajevich, Marcie Lorraine James-Kirby Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Highland Partnership, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Highland Partnership, Inc., Kirby Noonan Lance and Hoge, LLP and Higgs Fletcher and Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Curtis v. Betts et al
as 4:2005cv03884
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis
Defendant:
Joan Betts , Steve Shapiro , William Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
William Noonan et al v. Emilio T Gonzalez et al
as 8:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
William Noonan and Elizabeth Noonan
Defendant:
Emilio T Gonzalez and Alberto R Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
