Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Conservation Council for Hawaii et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Conservation Council for Hawaii , Animal Welfare Institute , Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce, Penny Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Defenders of Wildlife, et al v. U.S. Department of the Navy, et al
as 12-15680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 2:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Ray Mabus, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Ocean Mammal Institute, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 08-16270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OCEAN MAMMAL INSTITUTE, ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT M. GATES, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense, DONALD C. WINTER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Navy, CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Commerce and others
Ocean Mammal Institute et al v. Gates et al
as 1:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kahea, Surfrider Foundation Kaua'i Chapter, Ocean Mammal Institute and others
Defendant:
William T. Hogarth, Robert M. Gates, Carlos M. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
