Cases 1 - 10 of 25
TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY SERVICES et al v. NISHIDA
as 1:2020cv03733
Defendant:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and JANE NISHIDA
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY SERVICES, LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NETWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Community In-Power & Dev., et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1430
Petitioner:
Community In-Power & Development Association, Air Alliance Houston, Del Amo Action Committee and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RISE St. James, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1417
Petitioner:
RISE St. James, Air Alliance Houston, Sierra Club and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
as 1:2020cv01554
Plaintiff:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Center for Biological Div, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5078
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Forest Resources Association, Inc., Ohio Oil and Gas Association, National Association of Homebuilders of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Independent Petroleum Association of America
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Petroleum Institute and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1260
Petitioner:
Community In-Power & Development Association, Air Alliance Houston, Del Amo Action Committee and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1155
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Air Council and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, Adminstrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Intervenor For Respondent:
American Chemistry Council, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
STATE OF OHIO et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA , STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR , SALLY JEWELL, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Movant:
APPALACHIAN VOICES , CENTER FOR COALFIELD JUSTICE , COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
State of North Dakota v. EPA
as 17-1014
Petitioner:
State of North Dakota
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
