Cases 1 - 10 of 39
VOYAGER DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 3:2023mc80052
Debtor In Possession:
VOYAGER DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Samuel Bankman-Fried and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
In re: XMH Corp. 1, fka Hartmarx Corporation, et al.
as 2:2014cv08194
Defendant:
APS Laundry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of XMH Corp. 1 fka Hartmarx Corporation, et al.
In Re Debtor:
XMH Corp. 1,
In re: XMH Corp. 1, fka Hartmarx Corporation, et al.
as 2:2014cv06713
Plaintiff:
Realization Trust and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of XMH Corp. 1, fka Hartmarx Corporation, et al.
Defendant:
Schefres Fashions Inc.
In Re Debtor:
XMH Corp. 1,
In Re Metropark USA Inc.
as 8:2014mc00009
Defendant:
Era Clothing LLC
In Re:
Metropark USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
In Re Metropark USA Inc
as 8:2014mc00011
In Re:
In Re Metropark USA Inc
Defendant:
M Collective Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
In Re Metropark USA Inc
as 8:2014mc00013
In Re:
Metropark USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
Defendant:
Staff-It Group Inc
In Re Metropark USA Inc
as 8:2014mc00012
In Re:
Metropark USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
Defendant:
Simdog Inc
In Re Metropark USA Inc
as 8:2014mc00010
Defendant:
Frankie B Inc
In Re:
Metropark USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
In Re Metropark USA Inc
as 8:2014mc00014
In Re:
Metropark USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA Inc
Defendant:
Temeka Inc
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA, Inc v. 9Fivers, LLC
as 3:2014mc00920
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Metropark USA, Inc
Defendant:
9Fivers, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
