Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Geneva Laboratories Limited et al v. Oh et al
as 2:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
Geneva Laboratories Limited and Union-Swiss (Proprietary) Limited
Defendant:
Sabrina Oh, Beautyfublic Corp. and Cosmethings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Finkel v. O.H. & M. Electrical, Corp.
as 1:2023cv01076
Respondent:
O.H. & M. Electrical, Corp. and OH&M Electrical, Inc.
Petitioner:
Dr. Gerald R. Finkel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Coffman v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03698
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Maria R. Hawthorne and others
Whitfield v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03337
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L Havner, Jr., Stephen W. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hopkins v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Stephen W. Wilson and others
Park et al v. Pocha Pocha Inc. I et al
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Jin Young Park and Mi Young Park
Defendant:
Pocha Pocha Inc. I, Oh Soon Um and Youngsik Um
Oh et al v. Naylets Trucking Corp et al
as 1:2021cv04139
Plaintiff:
Sungyeol Oh and Songseon Cha
Defendant:
Naylets Trucking Corp and Fredy Ronny Quituizaca Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oh et al v. Trujillo-Montoya et al
as 1:2021cv01042
Defendant:
Jos R. Trujillo-Montoya and HYS Livery Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chang Qeu Oh and Joo Youn Oh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
