Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. Dimon et al
as 1:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund and City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust
Defendant:
James Dimon, Ashley Bacon, Linda B. Bammann and others
Nominal Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Todd A. Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund et al v. McClendon et al
as 5:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund
Defendant:
Aubrey K McClendon, Domenic J Dell'Osso, Jr, Michael A Johnson and others
Movant:
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Shi Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08323
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc., Kevin M. Modany and Daniel M. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Carson, et al v. Neopharm Inc, et al
as 1:2002cv02976
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Carson , Larson Capital Management and Local 66 Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund - Pittsburgh
Defendant:
Neopharm Inc , John N Kapoor , James M Hussey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Fener v. Belo Corp, et al
as 08-10576
Defendant - Appellee:
BELO CORP, ROBERT W DECHERD, BARRY PECKHAM and others
Appellant:
OPERATING ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND MISCELLANEOUS PENSION FUND (LOCAL 66)
Fener v. Belo Corporation, et al
as 08-12
Defendant - Respondent:
BELO CORP, ROBERT W DECHERD, BARRY PECKHAM and others
Movant - Petitioner:
OPERATING ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND MISCELLANEOUS PENSION FUND (LOCAL 66)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
