Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Lamb
as 3:2024cv02121
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Eric Lamb Individually and doing business as Pioneer Underground Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Rock Crushing Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Rock Crushing Solutions, Inc. and Jeremy Allen Soiland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Cedar Creek Corporation dba Nor Cal Mobile Rock Crushing et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Dan Reding, James E. Murray and others
Defendant:
Cedar Creek Corporation dba Nor Cal Mobile Rock Crushing and Katie Gove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Lonestar West Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Dan Reding, James E. Murray and others
Defendant:
Lonestar West Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Carlos J Romero Grading and Paving Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Carlos J Romero Grading and Paving Contractors, Inc. and Carlos J. Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pacwest Construction, Company
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Pacwest Construction, Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Mike Cross Construction et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Mike Cross Construction and Mike Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Norcal Crushers, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv06537
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Norcal Crushers, Inc. and David Soiland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Alex Sweeney Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv06407
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Alex Sweeney Construction, Inc. and Alex Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Pipe-Net, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv06267
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Dan Reding, James E. Murray and others
Defendant:
Pipe-Net, Inc. and Albert Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
