Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WSOU Investments, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
WSOU Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Salesforce, Inc.
Interested Party:
Orange Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jenkins et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00719
Plaintiff:
Emerson D Williams, Joe Jenkins and Telia U. Williams
Defendant:
Citibank, NA, Dale Oranges, CitiMortgage, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Streeter et al v. Izadi et al
as 2:2018cv01916
Defendant:
Arman Izadi, Aldi Law Group, P.C., Mymerh.com and others
Plaintiff:
Glow Threads, Inc. and Mark Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClary et al v. King et al
as 2:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Thomas McClary and Jason Williams
Defendant:
William A. King, Walter Orange, David Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Companion Property and Casualty Group v. Consolidated Agent Partners et al
as 3:2012cv00595
Plaintiff:
Companion Property and Casualty Group
Defendant:
Consolidated Agency Partners, Karen Faust, Highpoint Risk Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dobbs v. McGarvie et al
as 2:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gary Dobbs
Defendant:
Leobardo McGarvie, George Noel and Orange Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
