Cases 1 - 10 of 75
The Sands Harbor Marina Corp. v. USI Insurance Service National, Inc.
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
GREG W. EAGLE, PINE CREEK RANCH, LLC, THE SANDS HARBOR MARINA CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
USI INSURANCE SERVICE NATIONAL, INC., FKA Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Oregon, Inc., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., TISDALE & NICHOLSON, LLP and others
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. MoneyLion Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08308
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
MoneyLion Technologies Inc., ML Plus, LLC, MoneyLion of Alabama LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 85 National Banks: Rate of Interest on Loans, Discounts, and Purchases
Saada v. Golan
as 22-1966
Petitioner:
Isacco Jacky Saada
Respondent:
Narkis Aliza Golan
Amicus Curiae:
Sanctuary for Families, Inc., Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Georgetown Law Domestic Violence Clinic and others
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Ryan Bussee
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
