Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Curtis v. Kunes Country of Oregon, Inc
as 3:2023cv50343
Plaintiff:
Deveyn Curtis
Defendant:
KUNES COUNTRY OF OREGON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Flawless Kickz, LLC v. Kottio Consultations LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03500
Plaintiff:
FLAWLESS KICKZ, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company and Flawless Kickz, LLC
Defendant:
KOTTIO CONSULTATIONS LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company, MICHAEL REIS, in his individual capacity, MANNA WHOLESALE LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Leifheit v. Grant County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Spencer Edward Leifheit, III
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriffs Department, Todd McKinley and Grant County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Asuris Northwest Health et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2020cv04940
Plaintiff:
Regence BlueCross and BlueShield of Utah, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, Regence BlueShield of Idaho, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BCBSM, Inc. et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2020cv01853
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc., BCBSM, Inc., Wellmark, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Special Master:
Maura R. Grossman
3Rd Party Defendant:
Prime Therapeutics LLC and Omedarx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kremmel v. Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
Judy Kremmel
Defendant:
Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03583
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
