Other Statutes Cases
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01524
Plaintiff: Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant: United States of America, Otis D. Wright, II, Sheila English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action
Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II, et al
as 20-55509
Defendant / Appellee: OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court Judge, individual and official capacities, DOES, 1-10, DAVID L. HARLOW, U.S.M.S., individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAREE ANNETTE HARPER
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee: RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-55915
Defendant / Appellee: OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court Judge, individual and official capacities, DOES, 1-10, DAVID L. HARLOW, U.S.M.S., individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAREE ANNETTE HARPER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?