Cases 21 - 30 of 640
CROSS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68948
Plaintiff:
LOUISE CROSS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , C S R LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELISLE v. A C AND S INC
as 2:2010cv69035
Plaintiff:
BERNARD E DELISLE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIMBLER v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68970
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J KIMBLER
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, THE , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STACY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68967
Plaintiff:
ARLIE STACY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDMAN v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68971
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARDMAN
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING CO , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAASE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69004
Plaintiff:
CURTIS E HAASE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68994
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOGUE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69006
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE E HOGUE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOEL v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68966
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D NOEL
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANN v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69005
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R HANN
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
