Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Silsby v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 3:2011cv00477
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Barnes and Eric R. Silsby
Defendant:
LSI Title Company, Litton Loan Servicing LP, Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Silsby et al v. Ownit Mortgage Solution, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Barnes and Eric R. Silsby
Defendant:
LSI Title Company, Litton Loan Servicing LP, Ownit Mortgage Solution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gothan et al v. Ownit Mortgage Solution, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00172
Defendant:
Design Financial, Kim Gonzalez, Greenhead Investments, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Gothan and Rosalynn R. Gothan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Youngren v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
Grant Matthew Youngren
Defendant:
Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation, First Magnus Financial Corporation/Charter Funding, Litton Loan Sergicing, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Fosth et al v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00642
Plaintiff:
William James Fosth and Collette D. Putnam
Defendant:
Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., Litton Loan Servicing, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Acoba v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00408
Plaintiff:
Maria Trinidad N. Acoba
Defendant:
Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., Litton Loan Services, Litton Loan Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rios-Pacheco v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Rios-Pacheco
Defendant:
Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., Litton Loan Servicing, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
