Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Lipari Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02893
Defendant: Penske Leasing and Rental Company, ABC Insurance Companies 1-10, Philip Lipari and others
Plaintiff: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases
as 1:2017mc02038
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04504
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02368
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 2:2017cv02367
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, Christopher Donnelly and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. and others
Unknown: Molly McGrail Powers, Molly McGrail Powers and Molly McGrail Powers
Interested Party: Toshiba America , Inc, Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, ABC Appliance, Inc. and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 2:2013cv06327
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc. and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv05530
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc. and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia), Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02903
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc. and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?