Cases 1 - 7 of 7
William Maloof v. Level Propane Gases, Inc., et, et al
as 09-4066
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Respondent - Appellee:
LEVEL PROPANE GASES, INC., ET AL., PARK PLACE, INC., WHM EMPRISES, INC and others
William Maloof v. Level Propane Gases, Inc., et, et al
as 09-4067
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Respondent - Appellee:
LEVEL PROPANE GASES, INC., ET AL., PARK PLACE, INC., WHM EMPRISES, INC and others
William Maloof v. WHM Emprises, Inc, et al
as 09-4033
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Respondent - Appellee:
WHM EMPRISES, INC, PARK PLACE COMPANIES, INC., PARK PLACE, INC. and others
William Maloof v. BT Commercial Corporation, et al
as 08-3648
Intervenor / Appellee:
MARK UHRICH, Plan Administrator of the Consolidated Estate of Level Propane Gases, Inc., et al., WHM EMPRISES, INC, OVER-FLO LOT, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY SCHWARTZ, BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Defendant:
ABN AMBRO HOLDING, N.V.
William Maloof v. BT Commercial Corporation, et al
as 08-3648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Defendant - Appellee:
BT COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, Individually and as Agent of Deutsch Bank National Trust Company Americas LaSalle National Bank Association Provident Bank, fka Bankers Trust Company, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, NATIONAL CITY BANK, successor in interest to Provident Bank and others
Defendant:
ABN AMBRO HOLDING, N.V.
Intervenor - Appellee:
WHM EMPRISES, INC, LEVEL PROPANE GASES, INC., PARK PLACE COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00861
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00835
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
