Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wang et al v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008mc06032
Plaintiff:
Jiong Wang and Chao Xie
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Robert S. Muller, III and others
Ramalingam v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00036
Plaintiff:
Jothilingam Ramalingam
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak and others
Iqbal v. Gatner et al
as 1:2008cv00997
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Javed Iqbal
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gatner, Paul E. Novak, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nawaz v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Nawaz and Malik M. Nawaz
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wang v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv04453
Plaintiff:
Liang Wang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Boggero v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Giovanna Boggero and Giovanna Boggero
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luo et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007mc00065
Plaintiff:
Wei Luo and Qin Fan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Mikhnevich v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007mc06029
Plaintiff:
Uladzimir Mikhnevich
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Ganzalez and others
Khaliq v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01652
Plaintiff:
Madiha Khaliq
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
He et al v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
Zhi He and Qi Yue
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
