Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FORTE v. U.S. PENSION COMMITTEE et al
as 3:2015cv03386
Plaintiff: JOSEPH D. FORTE
Defendant: U.S. PENSION COMMITTEE, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BECKNELL v. SEVERANCE PAY PLAN OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND U.S. AFFILIATED COMPANIES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv04622
Plaintiff: ALAN M. BECKNELL
Defendant: SEVERANCE PAY PLAN OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND U.S. AFFILIATED COMPANIES and PENSION COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KOYE v. LONG TERM DISABILITY (LTD) PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES et al
as 3:2013cv00708
Plaintiff: SUSAN KOYE
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY (LTD) PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES, LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEIMLE v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2011cv07434
Plaintiff: BRIAN STEIMLE
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
MUCCINO v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03641
Plaintiff: CARYN MUCCINO
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SHVARTSMAN v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03643
Plaintiff: MARK SHVARTSMAN
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HART v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2011cv00025
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE HART
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
VAN DEVENTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv06344
Plaintiff: RALPH R. VAN DEVENTER, JR.
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
KOYE v. LONG TERM DISABILITY (LTD) PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES et al
as 3:2010cv04202
Plaintiff: SUSAN KOYE
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY (LTD) PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES, LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES and JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
HEWEL v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05343
Plaintiff: LISA HEWEL
Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CHOICES BENEFIT PROGRAM and THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?