Cases 11 - 20 of 21
DROBSCH v. PEPSICO, INC.
as 7:2022cv04216
Plaintiff:
DEVIN DROBSCH
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
King v. PepsiCo Inc
as 7:2022cv05351
Plaintiff:
Tyrell King
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
White v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 7:2022cv05198
Plaintiff:
Donedward White
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv05196
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS and Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
ELLIS et al v. PEPSICO, INC.
as 7:2022cv05200
Plaintiff:
Tracy Ellis
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Beatovic v. The PEPSICO Inc Disability Plan et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Defendant:
The PEPSICO Inc Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dwight M Beatovic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Thomas v. PepsiCo, Inc., Long Term Disability Program, et al.
as 1:2019cv00938
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc., Long Term Disability Program, et al.
Plaintiff:
James R. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DuBuske et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv11618
Plaintiff:
Gary Maynard, William DuBuske and Michael Duchaine
Defendant:
Employee Benefits Board, PepsiCo, Inc., PepsiCo Administration Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Joseph Jones v. Pepsico, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 1:2015cv01426
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan and Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Medina v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01852
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc. and Pepsico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
