Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
IVAN VALDEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Lewis v. USA, et al
as 16-5218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Janet Reno and others
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JANET RENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2013cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS JAIME PEREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PEREZ v. USA
as 1:2012cv01470
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
EDWIN GIOVANNI PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RODRIGUEZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEYS , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kirell Bettis v. Timothy Geithner
as 09-5057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kirell Francis Bettis
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, Michael Hoff, State Judge, Michelle Rosenblatt, State Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
