Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Hildenbrand v. Fahey et al
as 3:2012cv02959
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hildenbrand
Defendant:
Megan J Fahey, Mattie Peterson Compton and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 4:2012mc00233
Plaintiff:
Deborah D Peterson
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran et al
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 4:2008mc00104
Plaintiff:
Deborah D Peterson
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran et al
Movant:
Cook Collection Attorneys
Amacker et al v. Renaissance Asset Management LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
William E. Amacker, Lindy R. Bianchi, Stan Chow and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Irastorza and Raul Morales
Defendant:
Renaissance Asset Management LLC, Anthony Michael Ramunno, MAN FINANCIAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Mossman v. Staffaroni et al
as 3:2007cv01786
Plaintiff:
Brian Mossman
Defendant:
Michael G Staffaroni, Roger R Adams, Michael W Hessong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Freeman v. Staffaroni et al
as 3:2007cv01682
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman and Jack Freeman
Defendant:
Michael G Staffaroni, Roger R Adams, Michael W Hessong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Peterson
as 5:2007mc00597
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Douglas C. Peterson
Sierra Club v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 4:2007cv00608
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Sierra Club
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency, R David Paulison and William E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
