Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Anderson v. PHH Mortgage Services Corporation
as 3:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Benita Anderson
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services Corporation
Aguilera Ibanez v. PHH Mortgage Services
as 3:2023cv02084
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Del Rocio Ibanez and Esperanza Del Rocio Aguilera Ibanez
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tyler v. PHH Mortgage Service et al
as 3:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Lou Tyler
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Service, Deutsche Bank and Trust and Ocwen Loan Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rike v. PHH Mortgage Services et al
as 3:2022cv01530
Counter Defendant:
Gary Ray Rike
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation d/b/a PHH Mortgage Services, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for MASTR Asset-Backed Securities Trust 2006-WMC1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC1, PHH Mortgage Services and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rhonda D. Rike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
