Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Monica Shekar v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al
as 21-1943
Defendant / Appellee:
ALTISOURCE LLC, PHH MORTGAGE, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONICA SHEKAR
Monica Shekar v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 21-8013
Petitioner:
MONICA SHEKAR
Respondent:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, ALTISOURCE LLC, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Montgomery v. Ocwen Mortgage Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01040
Defendant:
Zack Lewis, Ocwen Mortgage Co. and PHH Mortgage Co.
Plaintiff:
Clarence Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albeck v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv07727
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, formerly known as Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocwen Financial Corporation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocwen Financial Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Albeck
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Izumi Saika, et al v. PHH Mortgage Solutions
as 20-2756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SHAKIBAI and IZUMI SAIKA
Defendant / Appellee:
PHH MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS
Glavtcheff et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2020cv03865
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MOENS and YVES GLAVTCHEFF
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, as successor by merger to OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
