Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DC JAIL
as 1:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DC JAIL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, JENNIFER DAVIS, JEQUAN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2017cv00895
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL T. PHILLIPS, TODD L. TRYON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
OLIVER KAREEM PHILLIPS
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE and LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
