Cases 41 - 50 of 75
LEE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63950
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H LEE and JEANETTE LEE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PENDLETON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63865
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES and MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUGHES et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63935
Plaintiff:
RAY J. HUGHES, RAY J. HUGHES, RAY J. HUGHES and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
W R GRACE AND CO CONN, W R GRACE AND CO CONN, W R GRACE AND CO CONN and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES and GARLOCK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARDUE et al v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES et al
as 2:2007cv63953
Plaintiff:
RONALD A PARDUE, SR and DIANE PARDUE
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, GARLOCK INC, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PROVOST et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63858
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. PROVOST and IRMA PROVOST
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, KEENE CORP, ACANDS INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and ACANDS INC
ThirdParty Defendant:
GARLOCK INC, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOSTER et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63918
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. KOSTER and REGINA KOSTER
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and GARLOCK INC
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK INC
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DESJARDINS et al v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES et al
as 2:2007cv63845
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DESJARDINS and NANCY DESJARDINS
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, FIBREBOARD CORP, GAF CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RINES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC et al
as 2:2007cv63847
Plaintiff:
HELEN R. RINES and HELEN R. RINES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC, FIBREBOARD CORP, GARLOCK, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOK v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63952
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COOK
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, GAF CORP and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEALD et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63956
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P HEALD, JR and MAXINE HEALD
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
