Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 23-2612
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Intervenor:
VISTRA CORP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 23-1778
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 22-3794
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Intervenor:
PJM INTERCONNECTION, L.L.C., PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION, DELAWARE DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 22-3796
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Intervenor:
PJM INTERCONNECTION, L.L.C., MARYLAND OFFICE OF PEOPLE'S COUNSEL, DELAWARE DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 22-2458
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Electric Power Supply Association, et al v. FERC
as 22-1065
Petitioner:
Electric Power Supply Association, PJM Power Providers Group, Calpine Corporation and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 22-1452
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Electric Power Supply Association, et al v. FERC
as 21-1217
Petitioner:
Electric Power Supply Association, PJM Power Providers Group, Calpine Corporation and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 21-3068
Petitioner:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Energy Harbor, LLC, et al v. FERC, et al
as 20-1761
Not Yet Classified:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP, J-POWER USA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD, CALPINE CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
ENERGY HARBOR, LLC, formerly known as FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS CORP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
