Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Accardi v. County of Suffolk
as 24-903
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ACCARDI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lieutenant ANDREW MANFREDONIA and others
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-7298
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEM FINANCIAL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL KAMINSKY, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and KEITH WATTS
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Diallo v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Ibrahima Diallo
Cross Defendant:
New York City Police Department, County Of Westchester, Westchester County Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMBERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-12,, Westchester Department of Public Safety Members John and Jane Does 1-10, 1-10 New York City Police Officers John Does and others
Cross Claimant:
Westchester Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Swayze v. Lafontant
as 22-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott Swayze
Defendant:
Theresa Lafontant, Police Officers John Does 1-10, said names being fictitious and unknown and ABC Company 1-10, said names being fictitious and unknown
Defendant / Appellant:
Natasha Lafontant
Omanoff v. Reifler et al
as 1:2022cv05827
Plaintiff:
Rodney Omanoff
Defendant:
Bradley Carl Reifler, Lisette Lou Ackerberg, Nancy Reifler and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Talking Capital Windup LLC f/k/a Talking Capital LLC, Kelcop Family LLC a/k/a Kelcop LLC, Bradley Reifler, Nancy Reifler, Lisette Ackerberg and/or John Does 1 and 2, as Trustees of Ackerberg Irrevocable Trust FBO Kesley Reifler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ri Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ligon v. City of New York
as 21-2089
Plaintiff:
Fawn Bracy, individually and on behalf of her minor son, W.B., Jacqueline Yates, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Letitia Ledan, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaenean Ligon, individually and on behalf of her minor son, J.G.
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officer Johnny Blasini, Police Officer Gregory Lomangino and others
Intervenor:
Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc., New York City Police Department Captains Endowment Association and others
Floyd v. City of New York
as 21-2091
Plaintiff:
Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis and David Ourlicht, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Floyd
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio, individually and in his official capacity and Commissioner Raymond Kelly, New York City Police, in his official capacity and individually
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, New York City, in his official and individual capacity, New York City Police Officer Goodman, in his official and individual capacity, Police Officer Jane Doe, New York City, in her official and individual capacity and others
Intervenor:
Sergeants Benevolent Association, Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc. and others
Corso v. County of Suffolk
as 21-1003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rachel Corso, Individually and on behalf of their son, B.C. a Minor and their daughter, L.C., a Minor and Bernard Corso
Defendant / Appellee:
Detective John Nee, the name "John" being fictitious, as the true first name is currently unknown, in their individual and in their official capacities, County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Vasquez v. Doe
as 21-520
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Keith Rosario, Police Officer Gary Lazar, Police Officer Edward McManus and others
Defendant:
The Village of Haverstraw, John Doe, Louis Falco and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kim Vasquez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
