Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Poulin v. USA
as 2:2023cv02173
Petitioner:
Matthew R Poulin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poulin v. USA
as 4:2023cv04129
Petitioner:
Matthew Richard Poulin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poulin v. Waite
as 2:2022cv02092
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Poulin
Defendant:
Alisha Waite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Poulin v. USA
as 4:2022cv04073
Petitioner:
Matthew R Poulin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poulin v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02073
Petitioner:
Matthew R Poulin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poulin v. Wagner et al
as 2:2021cv02309
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Poulin
Defendant:
Kerri Wagner, David Kuntz, Jennifer Mendez-Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv02570
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. , Oakley, Inc. , Yiyi Zhang and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" , Li Chen, Shenzhen Sailvan Network Technology Co. Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Oakley, Inc. v. Chen Xiao Chen Xiao et al
as 1:2015cv07847
Defendant:
Davis, Curryhan Cherryzheng, Alan and others
Plaintiff:
tmhzw.com, Angela Lineberger, mkaymqz.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Poulin v. Western Petroleum Company et al
as 1:2013cv06195
Plaintiff:
Therese Dubois Poulin
Defendant:
Western Petroleum Company , Petroleum Transport Solutions , Rail World, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
