Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Faynzilberg v. Provident Funding Associates, L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Yelena Faynzilberg
Defendant:
Provident Funding Associates, L.P. and 1-100 John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Faloye
as 1:2012cv00006
Defendant:
Adedoyin Faloye
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Provident Funding Associates, L.P. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS)
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Adedoyin Faloye
Counter_claimant:
Adedoyin Faloye
Counter_defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Faynzilberg v. Provident Funding Associates, LP et al
as 1:2010cv04230
Plaintiff:
Yelena Faynzilberg
Defendant:
Provident Funding Associates, LP and RBC Centura Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Matthews-Washington et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 1:2010cv01262
Plaintiff:
Ethel Jeraldine Matthews-Washington and Mary Loretta Adams-Jenkins
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Provident Funding Associates LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Provident Funding Associates, LP v. Obande
as 1:2010cv00894
Plaintiff:
Provident Funding Associates, LP
Defendant:
Bridget Obande
Provident Funding Associates LP v. Sillah
as 3:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Provident Funding Associates LP
Defendant:
Yusifu Sillah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Real Property
Provident Funding Associates LP v. Sillah
as 1:2009cv01947
Plaintiff:
Provident Funding Associates LP
Defendant:
Yusifu Sillah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Real Property
Provident Funding Associates LP v. Sillah
as 1:2009mi00264
Plaintiff:
Provident Funding Associates LP
Defendant:
Yusifu Sillah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
