Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Mark Thomas Bates et al
as 2:2015cv03292
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bates and Pacific Coast Markings, Inc
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Bates
as 2:2014ms00085
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bates and Pacific Coast Markings, Inc
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Bates et al
as 3:2014mc01129
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bates, Pacific Coast Markings, Inc, Carolino Construction Corporation and others
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Bates et al
as 2:2014mc00112
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bates and Pacific Coast Markings, Inc.
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Nothern California et al v. Pacific Coast Markings, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02979
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Nothern California , Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California , Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Pacific Coast Markings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Mark Thomas Bates et al
as 5:2013cv01631
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bates, Carolino Construction Corporation, International Fidelity Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
