Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL, GUTHRIE CORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER doing business as OSF SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
USA v. Robert Packer
as 22-3070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Keith Packer
PACKER v. MOMAH et al
as 1:2011cv00548
Plaintiff:
RUTH PACKER
Defendant:
EMEKA MOMAH, WILTON O. NEDD, PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
PACKER v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
RUTH PACKER
Defendant:
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PACKER v. DARCARS OF NEW CARROLLTON
as 1:2009cv02451
Plaintiff:
RUTH PACKER
Defendant:
DARCARS OF NEW CARROLLTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PACKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00848
Plaintiff:
LEONORE PACKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
