Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PAEZ NOGUERA v. MB DORAL, LLC
as 1:2021cv21383
Defendant:
MB DORAL, LLC doing business as MARTINI BAR
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ANDRES PAEZ NOGUERA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Baker v. Paez Eatery West, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv60795
Defendant:
Paez Eatery West, Inc., Omar Paez and Paez Eatery West, Inc. doing business as Enzos
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Paez v. Alvarez Plaza, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv21464
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Paez
Defendant:
Alvarez Plaza, Inc. and Jose R. Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Mota v. Samoho Healthcare South Beach et al
as 1:2014cv20489
Plaintiff:
Rafael De Jesus Mota
Defendant:
Samoho Healthcare South Beach, Guillermo Rochin and Sylvia Paez De Rochin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ruiz et al v. Intermodel Rail Management, LLC et al
as 0:2012cv62003
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ruiz , Raul Arteaga , Luis Badilla and others
Defendant:
Intermodel Rail Management, LLC, Gregory A. Bock, Jean M. Voytyshyn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Paez v. Carpaccio, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv24160
Plaintiff:
Cristiano Paez
Defendant:
Carpaccio, Inc. and Tom Billante
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Paez v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 5:2011cv00603
Plaintiff:
Pedro Paez
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Diaz et al v. Amerijet International, Inc.
as 0:2011cv61812
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz , Omar Vasquez , Roberto Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Amerijet International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151
Paez v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 5:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Caridad Paez
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jimenez v. Herrera et al
as 1:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
Hector Paez Jimenez
Defendant:
David Herrera and Patricia Cortina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
