Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Arconic, Inc., et al v. APC Investment Co., et al
as 19-55181
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST DICE ROAD COMPANY, INC., POWERINE OIL COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PILKINGTON GROUP LIMITED, CALIFORNIA HYDROFORMING COMPANY, INC., ARLON, LLC and others
AK Steel Corporation vs Prologis Inc., et al.,
as 2:2015cv09260
Plaintiff:
AK Steel Corporation
Defendant:
PAC Operating Limited Partnership and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation
Counter_claimant:
PAC Operating Limited Partnership , Palmtree Acquisition Corporation , Contech Engineering Solutions LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
AK Steel Corporation , PAC Operating Limited Partnership and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation
Third_party_plaintiff:
PAC Operating Limited Partnership and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation
Third_party_defendant:
Contech Engineering Solutions LLC , Arkema, Inc. and Henkel Corporation
Cross_claimant:
Arkema, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Henkel Corporation , Contech Engineering Solutions LLC and AK Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Arconic, Inc. et al., v. APC Investment Co., et al.,
as 2:2014cv06456
Plaintiff:
Arconic Inc, Alcoa Inc, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and others
Defendant:
Lakeland Development Company, APC Investment Co., Associated Plating Company and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Intervenor:
Federal Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
PMC, Inc., Philip E. Kamins, Silvey & Silvey, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901 Comprehensive Response, Compensation & Liability
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation v. Neely et al
as 3:2008cv03168
Plaintiff:
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation
Defendant:
Michael R. Neely, Perry J. Neely, Gary Neely and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
