Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marat v. Eagle Applied Sciences, LLC
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Patti L. Marat
Defendant:
Eagle Applied Sciences, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ratchford et al v. Regions Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Sue Ratchford , Kay Mitchell , Gina Nuckolls and others
Defendant:
Regions Financial Corporation and Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Morales-Arcadio et al v. Shannon Jr. et al
as 6:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio , Jose Rosalino Antonio-Candelaria , Juan Carlos Flores-Medina and others
Defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr., James G. Shannon, Sr., Cynthia Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Flores-Medina et al v. Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Flores-Medina , Roque Sanchez-Melchor , Demetrio Santos-Cruz and others
Defendant:
Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. , James G. Shannon, Sr. , James G. Shannon, Jr. and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio
Third_party_defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr. , Pattie Martinez, Shannon Vineyards, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patty v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 4:2011cv00235
Plaintiff:
Pamela Patty
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Bi-Lo, LLC and Bi-Lo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Norlock v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 5:2007cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patti Norlock
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Balch et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2007cv02016
Plaintiff:
Carol Balch, Carol Balch, Carol Balch and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
