Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PS) Peek v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Keith Peek
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stochevski v. Weingarten et al
as 3:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Walter Stochevski
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
Newman et al v. Weingarten et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Plaintiff:
Joel Newman
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
Peek v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023at00410
Plaintiff:
William Michael Peek
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Peek v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
William Michael Peek
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Automotive Training Authority, Inc. v. Peczeli et al
as 3:2022cv01840
Plaintiff:
Automotive Training Authority, Inc.
Defendant:
Karen Peczeli and Willis Peek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
(SS) Peek v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01828
Plaintiff:
Virginia Peek
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Psigen Software, Inc. v. Filer Express, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv08670
Defendant:
Filer Express, LLC, Tim L Peek, Jeffrey Romine and others
Plaintiff:
PSIGEN SOFTWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Peek Travel, Inc.
as 3:2018cv04628
Plaintiff:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Peek Travel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Peek Travel, Inc.
as 5:2018cv04628
Defendant:
Peek Travel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC and PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
