Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 15 of 15
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION et al v. APGAR TRANS, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01259
Petitioner: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Respondent: APGAR TRANS, L.L.C. and WALDEMAR BOZEK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION et al v. APGAR TRANS, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01336
Petitioner: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Respondent: APGAR TRANS, L.L.C. and WALDEMAR BOZEK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
WATTS v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION et al
as 3:2011cv05143
Plaintiff: BEATRICE E. WATTS
Defendant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION and RUBY C. MANNING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
MD SASS MUNICIPAL FINANCE PARTNERS-VI, L.L.C. v. PROCESSES AND CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00727
Plaintiff: MD SASS MUNICIPAL FINANCE PARTNERS-VI, L.L.C.
Defendant: PROCESSES AND CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC., PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION , DYE SPECIALTIES INC SALARIED PENSION PLAN TRUST and others
Counter_claimant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Counter_defendant: MD SASS MUNICIPAL FINANCE PARTNERS-VI, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION v. RONSON CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06550
Plaintiff: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Defendant: RONSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1348 Corporation organized under Federal Law as party

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?