Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
as 13-4537
Plaintiff - Appellee:
David Ross, Patio.com LLC, Steve Milles and others
Defendant:
Gerald Mollen, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Broome County and Eric T. Schneiderman, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant - Appellant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County and District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
as 13-4533
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Expressions Hair Design, Linda Fiacco, The Brooklyn Farmacy & Soda Fountain, Inc and others
Defendant:
Gerald Mollen, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Broome County
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County and District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County
Expressions Hair Design et al v. Schneiderman
as 1:2013cv03775
Plaintiff:
Expressions Hair Design , Linda Fiacco , The Brooklyn Farmacy & Soda Fountain, Inc and others
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman
Amicu:
The Kroger Co., Safeway Inc., Walgreen Co. and others
Movant:
Consumer Action , National Association of Consumer Advocates , National Consumers League and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Freeman et al v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
Bionca Freeman and Peter Freeman
Defendant:
Nga Tuyeta Nguyen and Tuan Anh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Higgs v. Teppel et al
as 1:2012cv06627
Plaintiff:
Joyce Higgs
Defendant:
Mark Teppel, Peter Freeman, Charles Samelson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
