Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CLAUDIUS PETERS GROUP, GMBH v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2019cv00988
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIUS PETERS GROUP, GMBH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
ROSS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
PETER ROSS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
ACKERMAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01749
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN and MRS. PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Peter Ackerman, et al v. USA
as 09-5317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Ackerman and Joanne Leedom-Ackerman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ACKERMAN
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PETER ACKERMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. United States Tax Court, et al
as 09-5166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr., Doctor
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Tax Court, Peter J. Panuthos, Judge, Douglas Shulman, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service, Office of Chief Counsel and others
BORITZ v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
PETER BORITZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 Civil Actions by Taxpayers for Refund of Taxes
CALDWELL v. UNITED STATES TAX COURT et al
as 1:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TAX COURT, PETER J. PANUTHOS, DOUGLAS SHULMAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ACKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
