Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Emiabata v. Emiabata et al
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Philip Emiabata and Sylvia Emiabata
Respondent:
US Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fry v. Hollingsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Philip Parker and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
Philips v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Wang v. deSouza et al
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Francis A. deSouza, Sam A. Samad, Jay Flatley and others
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al v. Opsens Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V. and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Haemonetics Corporation, OpSens Inc., OpSens Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Talent4Health LLC v. Braccio
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Talent4Health LLC
Defendant:
Philip Braccio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hubacek v. ON Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Philip R. Hubacek
Defendant:
ON Semiconductor Corporation, Hassane El-Khoury, Thad Trent and others
Philips v. P&F Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
P&F Industries, Inc., Kenneth M. Scheriff, Mitchell A. Solomon and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
