Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
In Re:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
ITO-STONE v. DBV TECHNOLOGIES S.A. et al
as 2:2019cv00525
Defendant:
DANIEL TASSE, DAVID SCHILANSKY, DBV TECHNOLOGIES S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS ITO-STONE
US FOODS, INC. v. SKYLINE HEALTH CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv15414
Defendant:
LANCASTER CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, DOWNS CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, OMAHA METRO CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
US FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
LOUIS-PIERRE v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
as 3:2018cv11380
Plaintiff:
ELVIRE LOUIS-PIERRE
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MA et al
as 2:2011cv05152
Defendant:
XIAO YING MA, TRONG D. NGUYEN, ESTATE OF TROY D. NGUYEN and others
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
